Deck title goes here

A short scoping line — who this is for and what it decides

Jonathan Jayes

2026-09-18

The situation

Context

Statement slides carry one sentence and nothing else

Market context

Adoption has grown for three years but the gap to peers is widening

Index, 2021 = 12

Key drivers

  • Tooling became cheap enough to trial without a business case
  • Procurement cycles shortened from nine months to about six weeks
  • Internal champions replaced central mandates

The gap is a distribution problem, not a capability one.

Note: Index rebased to 2021.   Source: Internal benchmark; sector survey 2025

By the numbers

Four figures set the scale of the opportunity

82 M€ Cost saved

16 Countries

2 450 Employees

~6 wks Time to value

Every figure on this slide is sourced below. A number without a base is decoration.

Source: Nexer Group annual report 2025; PostNord engagement summary

Options

Three routes are open, and they differ mainly in who carries the risk

Route What it involves Risk sits with Time to value
Pilot first One team, one workflow, fixed scope Nexer ~6 weeks
Platform first Build shared tooling, then onboard teams Shared ~6 months
Buy and adapt Licence a vendor product, configure it Client ~3 months

Note: Time to value measured from contract signature to first production use.

Bridge

Two thirds of the saving comes from a single lever

€ millions, annualised

Note: Figures rounded to the nearest million; totals may not sum.   Source: Engagement model v4

Target state

Three capabilities are in place and two are missing, and the gaps are all foundational

Note: Dashed boxes are capabilities that do not exist yet, not ones that exist and underperform.

Recommendation

Start with one workflow, prove it in six weeks, then decide on the platform

  • Weeks 1–2 — pick the workflow with the clearest baseline and the least integration
  • Weeks 3–5 — build in the open, with the receiving team in the room
  • Week 6 — measure against the baseline; publish the result either way

The decision this deck asks for is the six-week pilot, not the platform.

Detail on the pilot

Appendix

Appendix

Layout reference

Syntax that earns its place:

  • ## Kicker then ### Action title
  • ::: {.stats} with [42]{.figure} [Label]{.label}
  • ::: {.takeaway} for the bold lead-in
  • ::: {.units} under a chart
  • ::: {.source} for the bottom rail
  • [text]{.chip} and [text]{.chip .accent}

Per-slide attributes:

  • {background-color="#5A1F9F"} — statement slide
  • {background-image="assets/swirl-dark.jpg"} — divider
  • {.smaller} / {.scrollable} — dense slides
  • {visibility="uncounted"} — appendix
  • {visibility="hidden"} — parked

Nexer purple Highlight